Deconstructing the UFC’s Pound for Pound Most Dangerous Striker

 

Of all the exhilarating things that can happen when two fighters face off inside the Octagon, a fighter dropping an opponent to the floor with a single strike is perhaps the most iconic. The fundamental physics and biology of a strong and well placed strike to the head will trump the strength of beast, the heart of a warrior, and even a lifetime of training. But who is truly the best knockout artist in UFC history? The punch for punch, pound for pound most dangerous striker? To answer the question, let’s deconstruct the ingredients of striking, and see what we might learn about how fighters land on the highlight reel, for glory or for shame.

This analysis is not about counting career totals. If we look at just the list of fighters who have scored 10 or more distance knockdowns in the UFC/Strikeforce/WEC, we see some familiar names, and more than a couple champions.

And while these records are interesting, knockdowns and knockouts are biased towards career longevity and skewed towards heavier fighters. So this isn’t the answer. But we could also measure accuracy to correct for career length, looking for fighters with the best power head striking accuracy as a measure of their skill. Because swing as you might, when standing at a distance only about 25% of head strikes will actually land on target. Once a strike is initiated a more accurate fighter will be more likely to hit his target, and therefore has a better chance of knocking his opponent out. These guys may not overwhelm with flurries, but once they swing they hit. And that’s a sign of an effective striker.

Here are the five most accurate strikers with at least 150 attempted power head strikes in the UFC as of the end of 2012.

This is definitely another impressive list of highly skilled strikers, with even some overlap of names from out knockdown and TKO list. But just being accurate doesn’t always mean doing damage. So let’s create a new measure to determine the most dangerous striker. This qualifies as a “thought experiment,” but by using numbers intelligently we should be able to look past the single metric record holders to make a quantifiable claim as to who the most dangerous striker on the planet really is.

In theory, if a fighter wants to maximize the chances of knocking down an opponent, he should throw a lot of strikes, land them as often as possible, and throw them as hard as possible. The chances of scoring a knockdown then can be incrementally improved by boosting any combination of volume, accuracy, and power. These are the basic metrics that drive striking damage, which we will measure by Distance Knockdowns. But in order to determine the most effective striker, we’ll need to account for these variables properly and in context.

First, we’ll need to consider striking volume. This variable requires some corrective action, as a fighter who unloads 100’s of strikes should eventually hurt their opponent, no matter how inaccurate or ineffective their strikes may be. We don’t want to reward volume; instead we want to adjust for it. So we’re going to divide knockdowns by the number of strikes it takes to accomplish them. The fewer strikes per knockdown, the more effective and/or skilled the striker. Accuracy is implicit in this calculation, as more accurate strikers will make the most of their striking attempts. You can’t knock your opponent down on volume alone, you still have to land some strikes.

It’s also important to remember that not all strikes are created equal. The same overhand right or high kick will have very different outcomes depending on who threw it, and who absorbed it. The reality is: Size Matters. The physics of collisions rely on mass. Larger fighters that can put more body mass behind their strikes impart more momentum and kinetic energy into the heads of their opponents. More mass behind the strike means more brain rattling in the target, and more corresponding knockouts. It’s not just the mass of the fist or foot; it’s also the mass of muscles throughout the body if the strike is thrown properly. As we observe in UFC statistics the chance of a power head strike causing a knockdown rises consistently with weight class, demonstrating this effect.

This quick view of the results reminds us of our weight class bias. Upper weight class fighters dominate knockdown lists and finish far more fights by (T)KO. But if we want to compare fighters across weight classes to each other, we’ll have to account for this trend and normalize fighter performance based on size. Comparing these to aggregated division average benchmarks, we’ll then inflate the knockdown rate for smaller fighters, and deflating the value for larger fighters to arrive at a normalized value. You’ll have to trust me on the math. Once this pattern is adjusted for, we should be able to answer the question of who the pound for pound most dangerous striker is.

The experiment and number crunching boils down to a single winning metric. With the highest “adjusted knockdowns per attempted power head strike score,” Anderson Silva is statistically the most dangerous striker to ever compete in the Octagon. The rest of the top ten offers more familiar names of excellent strikers.

 

When a strike is attempted these ten fighters have maximized the effect of each attempted punch, kick, knee, or elbow far above and beyond their division peers. And only after our proper accounting of size differences and strike volumes could we see flyweights and heavyweights side by side on the same list. And there’s John Dodson with a slight edge over Pat Barry, representing extreme differences in size, but very close, and very superior striking prowess for both.

To see more analysis on the UFC most accurate or heavy-handed strikers, check out my striking assessment series on each of the UFC weight classes.

 

For more on the science and stats of MMA, follow @Fightnomics on Twitter or on Facebook. See more analytical MMA research at www.fightnomics.com.

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!
468 ad

One Comment

  1. Love this list says:

    Love this list and your analysis. some intersting names showing up on it!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. UFC 162: Anderson Silva vs. Chris Weidman, Deepest Stats Anywhere - Fightnomics | Fightnomics - [...] math and the answer is clear. In addition to holding various records for accuracy and knockdowns, Anderson Silva is …
  2. Betting Analysis: UFC 162 Anderson Silva vs Chris Weidman - Fightnomics | Fightnomics - [...] I did the math. Anderson Silva is the pound for pound, punch for punch most dangerous striker in UFC …
  3. Tweet-Sized Fightnomics Stats: UFC 162 Edition - Fightnomics | Fightnomics - [...] of Anderson Silva being pulling out of the fight have been exaggerated. And now we get to see the …
  4. Betting Analysis: UFC Fight Night 30 Machida-Munoz - Fightnomics | Fightnomics - [...] just the better striker here, but also one of the best strikers in UFC history. My own analysis of …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>